04-19-2012, 07:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-19-2012, 08:25 PM by Tony Wells.)
The 0.748 is given as a gaging dimension. In other words, not to be measured, but can be used to determine the other dimensions based on the assumptions that the theoretically perfect 0.748 is built into the gage used to inspect the part.
I'll go to the shop and sketch it up also to confirm Ed's work. GDT can be a bit hard to interpret if you're not used to it. Dave covered most of it.
Edit:
That drawing is misleading. The 45 degree angles do not come to a sharp edge. There is a flat that will be 0.0235 wide. Let's see if I can do the attachment correctly. I only added the "missing" dimensions. You will still need to refer to the other sketch.
Too large as an attachment, so inserted drawing should be here:
![[Image: test1.jpg]](http://i790.photobucket.com/albums/yy181/GrayLox_album/test1.jpg)
I'll go to the shop and sketch it up also to confirm Ed's work. GDT can be a bit hard to interpret if you're not used to it. Dave covered most of it.
Edit:
That drawing is misleading. The 45 degree angles do not come to a sharp edge. There is a flat that will be 0.0235 wide. Let's see if I can do the attachment correctly. I only added the "missing" dimensions. You will still need to refer to the other sketch.
Too large as an attachment, so inserted drawing should be here: